Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.

IF YOU HAVE BEEN SERIOUSLY INJURED due to the negligence or fault of someone else, you need an experienced lawyer who not only understands the law but one with expert medical knowledge of your physical injuries. Attorney and physician Paul J. Molinaro is that lawyer!

PAUL J. MOLINARO, M.D., J.D.

(Attorney and Physician)

MEDICAL EXPERIENCE

After graduating from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in 1991, Dr. Paul J. Molinaro trained in family medicine at San Bernardino County Medical Center in California. Dr. Molinaro has been practicing medicine in Southern California for twenty-five years in the fields of urgent care, occupational, and family medicine where he has gained a vast amount of experience handling patients of all ages with a huge variety of ailments including accidental trauma.

LEGAL EXPERIENCE

In 2006, Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D. and Nathan Fransen founded the law firm of Fransen & Molinaro, LLP. Dr. Molinaro handles the firm’s cases which deal with serious bodily injury whether the result of medical negligence, prescription drugs, medical device failure, or accidental trauma.

FORMAL EDUCATION

  • Lafayette College, B.A. Biology, 1987
  • University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, M.D., 1991
  • Chapman University School of Law, J.D., 2005

MEMBERSHIPS /LICENSES

  • California Real Estate Broker
  • Consumer Attorneys of Los Angeles
  • Medical Board of California
  • Orange County Bar Association
  • Orange County Trial Lawyers Association
  • State Bar of California
  • United States District Court, Central District of California
  • United States District Court, Eastern District of California
  • United States District Court, Southern District of California
  • United States District Court, Northern District of California

BRIEF BIOGRAPHY

Paul grew up in Northern New Jersey and graduated from Seton Hall Preparatory School before attending Lafayette College in Eastern Pennsylvania from where he obtained a degree in Biology. Returning to Northern New Jersey, Paul attended the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey – New Jersey Medical School. He then moved to Southern California where he trained in Family Medicine at San Bernardino County Medical Center in California (now Arrowhead Regional Medical Center). Paul graduated from Chapman University School of Law in 2005. Though he currently practices law full-time, Paul continues to practice medicine on a part-time basis. He also works part-time for EnStar and Paladin Managed Care Services where he assists with the medical management of workman’s compensation claims.

THE LAW OFFICES OF FRANSEN & MOLINARO, LLP

The law firm of Fransen & Molinaro, LLP is located in Corona, California but serves the entire State of California. Whether it’s a plaintiff or defense matter, we pride ourselves on representing California’s individuals and small business in matters involving the following:


EXPERIENCED LAWYERS

Having over a decade of experience in the real estate and mortgage world prior to becoming an attorney, there’s not much Nathan Fransen doesn’t know about real estate and mortgage law. Having been a practicing physician for 25 years and counting, there’s not much Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D. doesn’t know about medicine and bodily injury. Fransen & Molinaro, LLP maintains its reputation as an aggressive litigation firm by using their knowledge and experience to handling all of their cases.

We offer free consultations for medical malpractice, personal injury, bankruptcy, and basic estate planning matters. For general real estate, mortgage, and other issues, we offer a one one-hour consultation for a fee. For more information, please review the information on this website or call our office.

“I’m Sorry” Doesn’t Quite Cut It After Poisoning Kids, Does It?

“Juul CEO tells parents ‘I’m sorry’ amid teen vaping ‘epidemic'” (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/07/14/juul-ceo-kevin-burns-apologizes-parents-amid-teen-vaping-epidemic/1729367001/). Tell it to the Judge, Kevin. Of course, you would only be talking to a judge through your multi-million dollar legal defense team which is the kind you can easily afford with the billions of dollars that your company has made by marketing and selling poison to children.

If you suffered a miscarriage or delivered a baby suffering from birth defects after using JUUL devices, or if your teenager has become addicted to JUUL vapes, contact contact a lawyer. It is our goal to help put an end to this crisis by helping the victims file civil lawsuits to recoup their losses. If you are located in the State of California and want help, please call Attorney and Physician Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D. today for a free consultation.

The above text may be considered an ad from a California law firm.

Surgically Implanted Mesh: Risks, Benefits, Complications

“Surgical mesh is a medical device that is used to provide extra support when repairing weakened or damaged tissue. Most surgical mesh devices are made from synthetic materials or animal tissue.” (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pelvic-organ-prolapse/in-depth/transvaginal-mesh-complications/art-20110300). No doubt, you’ve seen the reports (some disguised as commercials) about the dangers of pelvic mesh. You probably wouldn’t have found this posting if you weren’t looking for more information. Let me start by saying the idea of surgical repair using a net is not new, not bad in and of itself, and has helped many women. Let me also say that this product has made an enormous amount of money for the manufacturers and distributors of mesh. And, it has made a lot of money for the surgeons who implant this mesh. When there is so much money to be made, people get greedy and downplay risks while overemphasizing benefits. Misrepresentations were made to the public and to the doctors.

Some doctors quickly realized the dangers of mesh surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (“POP”) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (“SUI”) and reserved the procedure to those limited situations where the benefits outweighed the risks. “Due to reports of complications during or after surgery for POP, in 2016 the FDA changed the classification of surgical mesh to repair POP transvaginally from a moderate-risk device to a high-risk device. The FDA orders apply only to transvaginal use of surgical mesh to treat POP. The orders don’t apply to the use of transvaginal mesh for SUI. (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pelvic-organ-prolapse/in-depth/transvaginal-mesh-complications/art-20110300). ” The FDA has “planned to convene an advisory committee meeting to share the available evidence and seek expert opinion on the evaluation of the risks and benefits of these devices. The Committee will be asked to provide scientific and clinical input on assessing the effectiveness, safety, and benefit/risk of mesh placed transvaginally in the anterior vaginal compartment, as well as identifying the appropriate patient population and physician training needed for these devices.” (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm). “The complication rate within 5 years of the mesh procedure was 9.8 [9.6:10.0]% ” (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-11821-w).

Some doctors believe that, despite the high risks of complications, they can implant mesh safely. “Vaginal mesh can be a safe and effective treatment option when used for the right candidates by experienced surgeons who are skilled in the appropriate surgical techniques. “Complications can occur with any surgery,” explained Dr. Visco, but those complications can be minimized when surgeons select appropriate candidates for the procedure and when doctors are skilled in the proper surgical techniques and experienced with vaginal mesh procedures.   In addition, surgeons who utilize mesh should have had training on how to manage mesh complications.” (https://www.dukehealth.org/blog/vaginal-mesh-dangerous-learn-facts).

And then, it appears that some doctors turned a blind eye to the risks and implanted mesh in any patient they could talk into getting surgery, because “millions” of women had mesh implanted. “In the last two decades, millions of women have turned to vaginal mesh implants as a possible solution to two annoying problems: urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, where body parts shift out of place due to childbirth or the ageing process.” (https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-million-dollar-deal-behind-the-vaginal-mesh-implant-mess).

According to the Cleveland Clinic, some complications associated with mesh implants are:
– Vaginal mesh erosion: This is the most common complication following the use of surgical mesh devices to repair pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Non-absorbable synthetic surgical mesh, such as that made of polypropylene or polyester, can break down or wear away over time. Part of the mesh may become exposed or protrude through the vagina
– Vaginal mesh contraction: Shortening or tightening of the mesh over time can cause vaginal shortening, tightening, or pain
– Pain during sexual intercourse
– Urinary problems
– Infections
– Bleeding
– Tearing of organs
– Pelvic organ prolapse that returns
– Emotional problems

If you, a family member, a loved one, a friend, or anyone you know has had pelvic surgery that involves mesh and had complications wherein the mesh fell apart, it may be time for you or that other person to contact a lawyer. There are statutes of limitations (deadlines), so waiting too long can mean no case. Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D. offers free consultations on mesh cases for patients who had surgery in California.

HOW THE PRESCRIPTION OPIATE EPIDEMIC STARTED

HOW THE PRESCRIPTION OPIATE EPIDEMIC STARTED

In the late 1980s, when I was in medical school, I was taught, and correctly so, that opioids were addictive and dangerous pain relieving medications which should be used in very limited situations. I was taught that opiate pain relievers were only to be used for short-term treatment of severe acute pain like that experienced immediately following surgery or for long-term palliative (end-of-life) care in cancer patients. My respected medical school professors and fellow students did not question these ethical and wise standards. We all understood that prescription opiates carried the same risks of tolerance and adduction as heroin and other such street drugs. We wanted to effectively treat our patients’ pain but not turn them into addicts.

For a time, the manufacturers and distributors of prescription narcotic were satisfied with a constant income stream from their narcotics line of products. A few decades ago, these companies reconsidered the facts that opiates were inexpensive to manufacture, highly addictive, easy to market, and could be a source of huge profits. These companies then began a systematic and relentless campaign of advertising to healthcare providers, patients, and government officials.

To the healthcare providers, they provided new studies that proved that opiates were not as addictive as was once thought. They created new “long-acting” formulations and assured physicians that these new formulations actually deterred abuse and were completely safe for long term use in all adult patients. They sent representatives to physicians’ offices, held seminars, and funded biased and inaccurate studies to advance and support their bogus claims.

To the patients, they explained that if a physician does not provide complete pain relief, that physician is not practicing quality medicine. They created the notion that pain is the “fifth vital sign,” blanketed waiting rooms with posters showing pain being rated on scales from one to ten, and convinced patients to demand pain medications for every ailment.

To the governmental representatives, they sent lobbyists to promote the enactment of laws forcing physicians to prescribe pain medications, insurers to cover the costs of pain medications, and pharmacies to maintain large stocks of these medications on hand. They infiltrated the government oversight committees with their former executives and changed government policy and regulation so that new opiate formulations would be quickly approved.

The net result of the opiate campaign by manufacturers and distributors was to create an insatiable demand for their opiate products and record profits year after year. Once the prescribers were convinced that the government required pain to be treated aggressively, and the insurers were forced to pay for total pain relief, and the patients demanded the most potent narcotics, the epidemic became all but unavoidable.

The amount of social and financial damage caused by these opioid manufacturers and distributors is enormous. While the government, the medical community, and the patients seem unable to get any control over this epidemic, private law firms are getting involved and bringing civil suits against these pharmaceutical companies to hold them accountable for the harms they cause. The Law Firm of Fransen & Molinaro, LLP provides free consultations to potential clients for these types of lawsuits.